
Will You Survive The Coming Finacial Crash
© 2005 Kent Daniel Bentkowski

AuthorÕs Note:
The following financial white paper is the first of a series entitled Destruction of the American Middle Class, which has been adapted from my unpublished manuscript of the same name. In this first installment, I will focus squarely upon financial matters of extreme importance to all American citizens, as well as to people from other nations around the world. The information below has been presented in a manner that should be understandable to all readers, and not merely those readers with a financial background.
While the financial situation in the USA grows evermore perilous by the day, I considered it to be a matter of moral imperative, that I disclose what I know, so all readers can make the immediate necessary moves to protect their own hard-earned assets. At the end of this report, I have included several solutions that can be immediately implemented in an effort to protect the readersÕ own family assets and homestead.
In the Fall Equinox 2005 issue of the Maybe Quarterly, I will present the second in this series, which will be an essay entitled The Politics of Belief, which just like this first part, was written for the manuscript of the Destruction of the American Middle Class project.
Disclaimer:
The following describes the basic fundamentals of the currently prevailing economic conditions of the United States of America. Even though these are the circumstances in which we now find ourselves, the theoretical information contained in this financial white paper remains valid throughout the entire world. While the following does not represent legal or investment advice, it is intended to serve as a tool with which the readersÕ own common sense and intelligence can make empowered and intelligent decisions about their own life, and the financial condition of their own household. I have always run my own household like a business, and my use of sound business practice is the reason I have been successful in preventing unnecessary expenditures in my own worst self-interest.
During the early 1980Õs, I worked as an investment banker, having passed the Series 7 and Series 63 certification exams given by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). An investment banker is an individual who works for a firm that helps private corporations raise money through their first public stock offering. In order to pass these exams, I had to become knowledgeable in matters concerning investment economics and the public sale of common stock. There was a tremendous amount of law that had to be memorized, and these certification exams were extremely specific in what they were asking in each and every question. Because of my having a photographic memory, I was able to prove complete mastery of the subject matter, something that made my employer extremely pleased.
Later on, I was able to use this knowledge to build a successful business in the field of graphic design and commercial printing. I was able to work as a sub-contractor in the defense industry, and as a U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) subcontractor. I attribute my success to the four-pledge guarantee that I gave to all of my customers. Within one year, I was able to stop all cold calls, as prospective clients were calling me to do business with them. The four-pledge guarantee was as follows:
Currently, I serve as a senior advisor to three separate businesses, all of which are successful and profitable. I have written this white paper in the interest of sharing with all readers of this document, information regarding the current economic climate in both the USA and throughout the rest of the world.
Executive Summary:
The time has now arrived where things have gotten out of hand here in the USA, as far as financial matters are concerned. If one listens closely, they will hear the increasingly nervous whispers of the economists and financial experts. The USA is hopelessly bankrupt --- a condition that has existed since March 1933 --- and this massive debt has now begun to exponentiate itself. Those financial analysts who are being completely honest, all agree that the coming financial crash will make the Great Depression of 1929-1934 look tame in comparison.
Because of my specific education in the areas of finance and investment banking, I feel compelled by moral responsibility to share what I have come to understand about this situation. I have prepared this financial white paper in the interest of sharing what I know and what my intuition and analysis tells me will be the likely outcome of this impending and inevitable disaster. I have also provided in my analysis, several proactive solutions that the reader may implement on the behalf of themselves and their family, so that they may be spared from this forthcoming disaster.
While the facts of this matter are lengthy, the solutions all share the following in common; fiscal responsibility and a measure of psychological restraint. My only hope is that by reading the following analysis, the reader will come to understand the urgency of the situation. Now is not the time to continue to deny and ignore the warning signs, as the sad outcome of this denial may result in the complete financial ruin of the individual and the ongoing financial stability and liquidity of their household.
The time of denial ends right here and now . . .
Why Public
Education Does Not Teach Real-World Math:
Throughout my own years in public school, I relentlessly hounded the various math teachers why they did not teach what I call real-world math. While there were mountains of data and formulas to contend with and memorize in what they called new math --- not a word was spoken about household finance; how to balance a checkbook, how to apply the concept of economies of scale to budget for a household with varying numbers of children, or how to protect oneself from being taken advantage of by the many banks, lending institutions, and credit-card issuing banks. Whenever I would raise what I knew were valid concerns, the math teacher would invariably find themselves embarrassed and without a satisfactory answer.
By the time I arrived at high school, I knew in my heart that there were specific reasons why I was not being taught properly in the subject of math. However, I would not put the pieces together until many years later, when my wife and I were going about the process of researching the purchase of our home. The scope of this white paper is to explain some of the current fundamentals regarding the United States economy. I will also explain how the reader can use this data to make intelligent decisions about their own financial situation, even as the monetary situation in this country grows evermore perilous in the months and years ahead.
After more than two decades of research, first working as a licensed investment banker, and ten years of owning my own business, I have come to the sad conclusion that real-world math is not taught in public school, because ignorant people are far easier to take advantage of, than those who are educated and savvy about such matters. On pg. 14 of her book The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, former senior policy advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) during Ronald ReaganÕs first term as President, Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, states that on December 28, 1928, a plan to dumb-down American students through what was called new math was discussed by people who had attended a meeting of the Progressive Education Association. This meeting was chaired by a Dr. Ziegler of the Education Committee of the Council on Foreign Relations, a group that through their actions seeks to destroy the national sovereignty of the United States, to unite all existing countries under what they call their own New World Order of global fascist government.
Dr. Ziegler is quoted in IserbytÕs book as having said the following to a Mr. O. A. Nelson:
ÒNelson, wake up! That is what we want, a math that the pupils cannot apply to life situations when they get out of school!Ó
As Mrs. Iserbyt further explains on pg. 15 of her book, Mr. O. A. Nelson was an assistant principal at Wilson High School in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as well as having also worked at Johnson High School in St. Paul, Minnesota. It took until 1952 for this new math to be instituted throughout the United States public education system. This coincidental twenty-three year period exists as a perfect example of how slowly the globalist program of gradualism (two steps forward, one step backward) proceeds, thus avoiding the detection from all but the most astute observers.
Mr. O. A. Nelson further stated:
ÒThat math was not introduced until much later, as those present [in 1928] thought it was too radical a change. A milder course by Dr. Breckner was substituted, but it was also worthless, as far as understanding math was concerned. The radical change was introduced in 1952. It was the one [form of new math] we are using now. So, if pupils come out of high school now, not knowing any math, donÕt blame them. The results are supposed to be worthless.Ó
In the preface of her book, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America (pgs. xvii-xviii), Iserbyt defines the onslaught upon the minds of our children as a new and different type of war. While she does not use the specific term, I contend that this new type of war belongs under the general heading of Information Wars. The following bullet-points from IserbytÕs book represent the primary methodology that has been used against our children in the fighting of this Info War:
á
A war about which the
average American hasnÕt the foggiest idea.
Iserbyt goes on to state the following about why Americans do not understand what has been happening to their children without their consent:
ÒThe reason Americans do not understand this war is because it has been fought in secret --- in the schools of our nation, targeting our children who are captive in classrooms. The wagers of this war are using very sophisticated and effective tools.Ó She then lists the three primary strategies, which have proven to be quite effective, especially in that they are never explained to any of the students (or their parents) as part of their actual public education curriculum:
John Taylor Gatto, who was a New York City public school teacher for thirty years, becoming both New York City Teacher of the Year and New York State Teacher of the Year a total of four times combined, had the following to say on pgs. xxxv-xxxvi of his groundbreaking 1992 book entitled Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling:
ÒI began to wonder,
reluctantly, whether it was possible that being in school itself was what was
dumbing [the students] down. Was
it possible I had been hired not to enlarge childrenÕs power, but to diminish
it? That seemed crazy on the face of it, but slowly I began to realize that the
bells and the confinement, the crazy sequences, the age-segregation, the lack
of privacy, the constant surveillance, and all the rest of the national
curriculum of schooling were designed exactly as if someone had set out to
prevent children from learning how to think and act, to coax them into addiction
and dependent behavior.Ó
Gatto further explained on pg. 154 of his 2003 book, The Underground History of American Education, the reasons why someone wanted the children dumbed down:
ÒFaced with the
problem of dangerous educated adults, what could be more natural than a factory
to produce safely stupefied children? YouÕve already seen that the system has
only limited regard for brainy people, so nothing is lost productively in
dumbing down and leveling the mass population, even providing a dose of the same
for Ôgifted and talentedÕ
children. And much can be gained in social efficiency. What motive could be
more ÔhumaneÕ than the wish to defuse the social dynamite positive science was
endlessly casting off as a byproduct of itsÕ success?Ó
Further evidence of this agenda to dumb-down the population is found within the pages of a May 1979 Bilderberg Group internal white paper that had been leaked to the public in 1986, which has become generally known as Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars. Because the Bilderberg Group is an international group, this document was likely the creation of the Tavistock Institute, which itself does study and implement the psychological programming of large societal groups. This 56-page report describes the many ways by which large societal groups of people can be programmed, and manipulated by the analysis of household systems models and something called economic shock testing, which on pg. 34, is described in the following manner:
ÒEconomic engineers study the behavior of the economy and the consumer public by carefully selecting a staple commodity such as beef, coffee, gasoline, or sugar, and then cause a sudden change or shock in itsÕ price or availability, thus kicking everybodyÕs budget and buying habits out of shape.Ó
The summary that appears on pgs. 47-48 provide chilling details as to the way in which larger society is regarded by the global elite. These details explain why basic education has been withheld from larger society, which is explainable once Albert EllisÕ definition of intellectual fascism is applied. Simply put, intellectual fascism is the belief held by the global elite that there are certain groups of people who should not be educated, because they are inferior in some way.
This group of people has been variously referred to as useless eaters, useless feeders, useless breeders, and unwashed minions. Secret societies refer to this group of people, the uninitiated, as the profane and the vulgar. Yet another derogatory term used to describe ordinary citizens is human capital, which is used primarily to describe human beings whose only purpose is generate wealth for the upper class elite, a group no larger than 5% of the total population. Most recently, however, this term has begun to be used to describe school children. Using the term human capital to describe people implies ownership, suggesting that our lives are much less free than we have been led to believe.
Still another example of this way of thinking is the term human resources, which is used in the corporate world. Most workers have been told the exoteric (or public) meaning, which is a corporate department that meets the needs of the workers. After all, this is where one goes when they want to request their vacation, change their health insurance, or enroll in the company retirement and profit-sharing plans. These same people were never told the true esoteric (or private) meaning, which is they are the human resources of the company, which again implies ownership of these workers by the corporation.
Read the following quotations from the Bilderberg Group report, and see if you can address the question of which population group is being referred to by the mind-set that created the report. The amount of behind-the-scenes research that these private think-tank type groups have undertaken are stunning in that there has been so little information leaked to the public about such projects. While most people attempt to deny that such research is conducted on an ongoing basis, the work of the tireless Internet research community has shined a light upon these dark black-budget projects.
When speaking of the Bilderberg Group in specificity, it has been the work of Jim Tucker, Daniel Estulin, and Tony Gosling that has opened up many peopleÕs awareness of this group that acts in their own self-interest, to the tremendous detriment of every government of every country represented at the Bilderberg Group annual conferences.
Check the Bibliography section at the end of this paper for the most-complete Internet copy of this document, which include the systems diagrams and economic formulas. The webpage that contains this document supposes that the document is from the Central Intelligence Agency. However, there is wording in the document to the effect that 1979 represented the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Quiet War. The most significant event that occurred twenty-five years earlier was the first meeting of an unnamed international group in the Bilderberg Hotel in Oosterbeek, Holland on the weekend of May 29-31, 1954. This international consortium came to be known as the Bilderberg Group, the group whom I believe authored the document:
May 1, 1979
Security (pg. 3):
This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of persons in a position of great power, and without the full knowledge of the public, uses such knowledge and methodology for economic conquest --- it must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists between said person or group of persons, and the public.
The solution of todayÕs problems requires an approach which is ruthlessly candid, with no agonizing over religious, moral, or cultural values.
Diversion: The Primary Strategy (pgs. 47-48):
Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance.
This is achieved by:
These preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of social automation technology. The general rule is that there is profit in confusion; the more confusion, the more profit. Therefore, the best approach is to create problems and then offer the solutions [emphasis mine].
Does any of this describe the world in which we all live?
Of course it does! We live in a society that finds itself continually fascinated with matters of no real importance --- such as our obsession with celebrity news, television, sports and sports stars, supermodels, and movie stars. A great deal of effort is expended upon these meaningless diversions, such as the trials and tribulations of Michael Jackson, Martha Stewart, Paris Hilton, and others who came before and of those who will follow. Entire channels are devoted to this form of tele-cinematic voyeurism.
The interesting thing to note, is the reference to creating problems and then offering solutions to those problems, which I will discuss immediately below.
Has the reader come to a conclusion about which population group is being referred to, by the above? IÕll provide a clue --- it refers to anyone who makes more than $150,000.00 US$ annual income, which represents the upper 5% of everyone in the USA. The rest of us are just scraping by, with only two-thirds of the population now being able to afford their own home, according to statistics from the United States Census Bureau.
Problem-Reaction-Solution:
The Hegelian Dialectic was the creation of German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), and most recently has been popularized by researcher-author David Icke (rhymes with like) as Problem-Reaction-Solution, appearing as such for the first time ever in his September 1995 book entitled ÔÉ And The Truth Shall Set You Free.Õ Since Icke formulated and restated HegelÕs Dialectic as Problem-Reaction-Solution, it has garnered widespread understanding and acceptance in the Internet True-Government-Crime research community, as well as in the minds of those of us who are spiritually awake and alert.
Problem-Reaction-Solution is extremely straightforward and easy to understand.
Because we are discussing public education, allow me to provide an example completely within that context. We have already learned from our quote from Mr. O. A. Nelson above, that the new math was designed to fail and teach nothing usable to the students within real-world applications. The designed failure of new math created the crisis of an artificial problem, as it would have been just as easy to implement a math system that actually worked. Throughout the three stages of problem-reaction-solution, it is crucial that both sides of the crisis are managed by the same people, some of who work as change-agents.
A change-agent is a person who leads a change project or business-wide initiative by defining, researching, planning, and building support for the project. Change agents must have the conviction to state the facts based upon data, even if the results are undesired. All sorts of people are working as change agents for the new world order, where they are demanding superficial changes based upon adherence to the NWO plan, being completely unconcerned with the negative aspects of the initiative. A well-known example of a change-agent is Henry Kissinger, who has worked behind the scenes in both government and in groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations to bring about the world government plan brought forth by those who I will refer to here as simply, the globalists.
Because the new math system was obtuse and difficult for the students to understand, quite naturally, the State-level standardized test results would turn out to be a complete disaster. So then, why was anyone surprised when the students started to display low levels of math aptitude, as the years passed on into decades? Well meaning parents and teachers, who were completely unaware of what had been done to the children on purpose, decided to revolt against the system, creating the requisite reaction that is needed to fulfill the Hegelian equation.
Parents had become outraged, and rightly so.
T. H. Bell, when he was U.S. Secretary of Education (1981-1984) said:
Ò[We] need to create
a crisis to get consensus in order to bring about change.Ó
In the all-important second reaction phase, public outrage is fomented. The public demands that something, anything, must be done to repair the system that has failed by ingenious design. ÒWhat are you going to do about this problem?!Ó good-hearted people demand. Unfortunately, what these well-intentioned people never realize is that problems such as these are stage-managed, so the desired result can be easily manipulated into existence. In the case of public education, the contrived solution arrived in the form of something that came to be known as outcome-based education.
The solution offered to the problems created by the new math, dropping reading aptitude, and similar problems in other subjects, has come to be known as outcome-based education. The primary delivery methods of this education system were B. F. Skinner-based tools disguised as modern education methods. Direct Instruction, Mastery Learning, and Outcome-Based Education was the latest incarnation of SkinnerÕs 1960Õs system of Programmed Instruction. Skinner was a behaviorist-psychologist, and he is best known for his Skinner Box experiment, which was based upon the concept of Operant Conditioning.
In Jennifer BothamleyÕs Dictionary of Theories (pg. 386), operant conditioning has been described in the following manner:
ÒOperant theory
analyzes the interaction between the organism and its environment into a
three-term sequence. A successful experimental analysis identifies the
environmental cues (discriminative stimuli) which determine the occurrence of
behavior (operant) and of the environmental events (reinforcers) necessary for
the establishment and maintenance of the behavior. The theory has had a
fundamental impact on psychology. It is chiefly criticized for its exclusion of
unobservable, inferred psychological states.Ó
In other words, operant conditioning describes the system of behavior modification. Has the reader noticed that in the above definition of operant conditioning, there is a reference to a three-term sequence? This refers to the Hegelian three-term dialectic, which as it says above, is necessary for the establishment and maintenance of behavior.
On February 26, 2005, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates made the following comments in a keynote address at the National Education Summit on High Schools. During this speech, Gates made some revealing comments concerning the American public education system being broken:
ÒWhen we looked at the
millions of students that our high schools are not preparing for higher
education --- and we looked at the damaging impact that has on their lives, we
came to a painful conclusion: AmericaÕs high schools are obsolete. By
obsolete, I donÕt just mean that our high schools are broken, flawed, and
under-funded --- though a case could be made for every one of those
points. By obsolete, I mean that our high schools --- even when theyÕre
working exactly as designed ---
cannot teach our kids what they need to know today.
Training the workforce of
tomorrow with the high schools of today is like trying to teach kids about
todayÕs computers on a 50-year-old mainframe. ItÕs the wrong tool for the
times. Our high schools were designed fifty years ago to meet the needs of
another age. Until we design them to meet the needs of the 21st century,
we will keep limiting --- even ruining --- the lives of millions of Americans
every year.
Today, only one-third of our students graduate from high school ready for college, work, and citizenship. The other two-thirds, most of them low-income and minority students, are tracked into courses that wonÕt ever get them ready for college or prepare them for a family-wage job Ð no matter how well the students learn or the teachers teach. This isnÕt an accident or a flaw in the system; it is the system.Ó
On February 27, 2005, the very day after GatesÕ speech, Maybe Logic Academy member Metachor posted the following comment about the true goal of public education, in response to GatesÕ speech:
ÒI work as a high-school teacher in Virginia, as does one of my parents. We both agree with [Bill] Gates on this issue: public high school in America was never intended to prepare children for college. The original goal of the founders of American public education was to produce good factory workers who would obediently follow orders to carry out simple tasks.Ó
Charlotte Iserbyt also concurs with the above assessments of the American public education system, in the following quote from pg. xii of the Foreword to her book:
ÒAmericans forget that the present government education system started as a Prussian import of the 1840Õs-1850Õs. It was a system built on HegelÕs belief that the state was a ÔGodÕ walking on earth.Ó
This also ties into Albert EllisÕ concept of intellectual fascism, which is:
Ò. . . the arbitrary belief that individuals possessing certain traits (such as those who are intelligent, cultured, artistic, creative, or achieving) are intrinsically superior to individuals possessing certain other traits (such as those who are stupid, uncultured, unartistic, uncreative, or unachieving). The reason why the belief of the intellectual fascist, like that of the politico-social fascist, is arbitrarily simple: there is no objective evidence to support it. At bottom, it is based on value judgments which are definitional in character and cannot be empirically validated.Ó
With a member of my own family marrying into a family belonging to the global elite, I have witnessed Intellectual Fascism firsthand. Those in this group of the upper 5% of wealth in this country truly believe they are better than the rest of us, whose only major differences are our own wealth and spheres of influence. They believe that to rule is their birthright. To get back to my original point, the reasons why real-life math is not taught in public schools appears to be a direct outgrowth of intellectual fascism.
The Current
Financial Crisis, and What You Can Do About It!
The experts all agree --- the Federal Reserve currency of the United States is nearing collapse --- but when this will actually occur is anyoneÕs guess. However, there are many factors, which will be discussed throughout this white paper, which are contributing to the collapse. It appears we are in the early stages of a series of events that will culminate in the outright destruction of the U.S. dollar as the worldÕs reserve currency. What this means in simple terms is the worldÕs economic system is traded in U.S. dollars. It also appears that the reason for the current runaway deficit spending and the printing of greater amounts of Federal Reserve Notes is this destruction is being done on purpose, with those truly in the know taking their gains prior to itsÕ inevitable collapse.
Why I have written this white paper is because I do not wish to see people being blindsided by this future event. The reader can take my words as a caution, and make the necessary steps to protect their assets and savings, or the reader can ignore my words and later suffer the consequences of the actions of people whom they do not know. I assure you that every single fact discussed in this white paper can be easily verified by searching for the information to confirm that indeed everything I am saying is true. Having the ability to see the bigger picture, it is my duty as a Constitutional Protectionist to warn people of the impending financial doom.
It is no longer a matter of if this will happen, but when . . .
How The Federal
Reserve Prints Money:
The Federal Reserve Bank is a private, central bank, that prints what is known as fiat currency. This is money created out of thin air, and it comes with little effort that billions upon billions of dollars can be printed at the ridiculous sum of two-cents per bill. Whether that bill happens to be a one-dollar note, or a one-hundred dollar note, it costs the Federal Reserve Bank the same two-cents. After the money is printed for this outrageously low cost, the member banks then turn around and put the money into circulation, giving their member banks a discount rate. The friendly neighborhood bank then lends it or passes it onto the public (you and I) at full face value.
This represents $19.98 profit on each and every twenty-dollar note!
The answer of who owns the Federal Reserve cannot be found by calling your local Federal Reserve Bank branch. All you will receive by means of an answer is that it is the member banks that own the Federal Reserve Bank system. While this is technically true within the context of semantic deception, it does not address the matter of whom it is that owns the member banks. If one should become brave enough to ask who owns each individual bank within that system, they will be met with complete and utter silence. The teller behind the counter does not know the answers to these questions, and no one ever bothers to inform them of these details of ownership.
By using the name Federal Reserve Bank, the public is lead to incorrectly believe that the Federal Reserve is somehow a part of the federal government of the United States. But, this couldnÕt be further from the truth. The Federal Reserve is not a department of the U.S. Treasury, and it cannot be found among the lengthy listing of the complete federal government departmental structure. After many years of research, I have at last stumbled across the list of the shareholders of the various member banks of the Federal Reserve banking system. It may come as a surprise to find out that the list of stockholders reads like a whoÕs-who of the global elite --- with names such as Rockefeller, Rothschild, Warburg, and Lehman among them.
In the book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, the great American patriot Eustace Mullins indicates that because the Federal Reserve Bank of New York sets interest rates and controls the daily supply and price of currency throughout the United States, the owners of that bank are the true owners of the entire Federal Reserve system. Mullins states that Òthe shareholders of these banks which own the stock of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, are the people who have controlled our political and economic destinies since 1914Ó [when the Federal Reserve Act was signed into law]:
The member banks that own and control the Federal Reserve Bank of New York are:
These people, acting in their own interests, have created a system of financial slavery, whose primary vehicles of entrapment include most prominently the home mortgage and the high-interest credit card systems. Every single person who involves themselves in either or both of these financial screw-jobs will spend the fantastic majority of their life making seemingly endless payments to the banks within the Federal Reserve banking system. And, if this is NOT enough advantage for these individuals, their system of fractional-reserve banking even allows them to loan out ten-times the money they have on deposit, and then charge interest on the money lent!!
The money that is printed under this tyrannical system is created through a series of bookkeeping entries. It does not exist in any other form. The Federal Reserve currency is in the process of collapsing because of a federal budget deficit that is in the process of exponentiating itself, and when the big hit occurs, it will likely make the Great Depression of 1929-1934 look many orders of magnitude smaller than the forthcoming event. Many of these banks have loaned out so much money during the financial bubble of the past twelve years (1993-2005), that the average person will be faced with two options --- pay off all their outstanding debts at once --- or lose everything by seeing their home, automobiles, and their life savings crumble into dust.
The
Federal Reserve Prospects For The Dollar:
The long-term prospects for the dollar are not good. In comparison to other world currencies like the Euro, on the global currency market, the dollar is now worth about $0.70. This factor alone has seen all the big money in the global currency trade being shifted out of the dollar and into one of the more stable currencies, like the Euro, which is the strongest global currency at the present time. The success of the Euro can be attributed to itsÕ relative young age as a currency, along with it being backed by gold. The Euro also has the advantage of balancing the wealth of the several nations who are now using it as their common currency. It is my personal opinion that the dollar is being collapsed on purpose, so a Euro-like monetary system can be implemented throughout the USA, Canada, and Mexico. This will be called the Pan-American Union, and will be based upon the structure of the European Union. The establishment of these regional monetary systems is an example of the gradualism that Charlotte Iserbyt discusses in her book, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America.
Two important economic statements were made in February 2005 by both the current and most-recent past chairmen of the Federal Reserve Board. The current chairman, Alan Greenspan, said the following as part of his semi-annual report to Congress, which took place on February 18, 2005:
ÒSeveral important economic challenges confront policy makers in the years ahead. Prominent among these challenges in the United States is the pressing need to maintain the flexibility of our economic and financial system.Ó
It is extremely curious that he would make a statement such as this. What has happened in just the past five years alone will make it nearly impossible to maintain the flexibility of this system, because it has been based in recent years upon easy credit and low interest-rates. The Federal Reserve has maintained itsÕ monetary system by manipulating both inflation and deflation through the rising and lowering of interest rates. It is important to note that the interest-rate set by the Federal Reserve is currently at a forty-six year low, which has been done to prop up the dollar in an attempt to forestall itsÕ inevitable demise, which will be the ruin of many millions of people in this country when it finally does occur.
Precisely fifteen days prior to GreenspanÕs comments, ex-Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker had the following to say about the present condition of the U.S. economy:
ÒBelow the favorable surface of the economy, there are as many dangers and intractable circumstances as I can remember. Nothing in our experience is comparable. We are consuming about 6% more than we are producing. What holds the [currency] together, is the massive flows of capital from abroad. A big adjustment will inevitably become necessary long before Social Security surpluses disappear and the deficit explodes. We are skating on increasingly thin ice.Ó
BushÕs recent privatization plan for the Social Security trust fund is nothing more than a thinly-disguised plan to gain access to this large sum of money, and it has become necessary because the entire house of cards has become destabilized and wobbly. VolckerÕs comment about the trade deficit, namely that we are consuming more than we are producing, represents the net result of so-called free-trade agreements such as NAFTA and GATT. Unfortunately for many Americans, these are meaningless acronyms.
Both China and Japan have been hoarding large quantities of U.S. dollars, which has been helping to keep the U.S. dollar from collapsing in the short term. However, what both countries have been doing is placing their orders in a manner which bets on a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar. They make a profit when the currency later does decrease in value, and especially China, has been trading their profits in for U.S. Treasury securities, which not only allows them a nice profit, but also allows them to purchase large blocks of the U.S. government, one piece at a time. By pushing the U.S. dollar lower, their currencies stay higher. Their export markets flourish, as a country such as China is able to take advantage of employee expense of only pennies on the dollar, when compared to the financial outlay of U.S. employees.
In July 2001, the truly big money on this planet started betting against the U.S. dollar. Because of the current financial condition of this country, the big concern is that more and more countries will start to voice their opinion that the U.S. should lose itsÕ status as global reserve currency. One of the best-kept secrets of the Iraq war is that Saddam Hussein had begun asking that his oil customers pay for their oil imports in Euros. This happened just before the Bush White House decided he was dangerous again. It was not surprising to me to find this story not covered by any major media outlet. Therefore, whatever the Bush junta may say publicly about the reasons for the second Iraq war, the reason is truly about oil. They even had the audacity to call it Operation Iraq Liberation, until immediate and justified public outcry forced them to rename the war.
How They Steal Our
Wealth (manipulated stock
market crashes):
When I became a licensed investment banker, one of the first things I was taught was the manner in which the stock market can be manipulated, one stock at a time. How this is typically done is by first driving the price up through public demand. Stockbrokers recommend certain stocks to their clients, and the more people that purchase, the higher the stock price travels. Then, when the stock price is sufficiently inflated, the big money suddenly pulls out of that particular stock, leaving the general public to absorb the loss.
This technique is known as the pump and dump.
Here, profit can be made in two distinct ways. First, the big money can dump the stock at the highest premium price, which maximizes the profit. At the same time, the big money sells the stock short and/or purchases put options, which means they are selling stock they do not own, and simultaneously, they are betting that the stock will drop in price. Later on, after the stock price dives, they can re-purchase the same stock at a tremendous discount. In effect, this transfers money out of our middle class life-savings and 401(k) retirement accounts, and places it right in the hands of the global elite. Those acting in the manner I describe here, make a profit going up AND coming down! When I took my certification exams, I was told that this was illegal, and the SEC would prosecute if I dared such an easily traceable action.
Let us look at how this works in the real-world environment . . .
In the dot.com boom of the 1990Õs, tens of millions of Americans bought stock for the very first time. Hoping for their slice of the American Dream, more than 125 million Americans invested significant amounts of money in the market, and specifically in the computers and technology sectors. These were middle-class people that had invested their life-savings, their childrenÕs college funds, and even their retirement and rainy-day savings. As many stocks rose from dollars to hundreds of dollars per share, the excitement was too much to ignore. By the time of the Spring 2000 crash, 56.6% of all Americans were invested in the market to some degree.
During the stock market crash of 2000, six-trillion dollars of money that had belonged to the middle class, had been transferred into the hands of the elite upper 5%. It was done by using the techniques mentioned above. Just before the crash, the big money suddenly pulled out of the market. Mr. and Mrs. Middle America never understood what was about to happen, and they kept their money in the market. After the stock market had reached itsÕ lowest point, the big money bought back into the market for literally pennies on the dollar. This allowed them to come to own an even larger share of the wealth of this nation. The people who had done this werenÕt all American citizens, either. They represented China, Japan, the Middle Eastern oil countries, and Russia. The U.S. government also bought into the collapsed stock market, holdings that never appear on their yearly budget spreadsheets.
General Motors for example, saw their stock price drop 60% from itsÕ high. This was quite serious, because the financial size of GM is equal to the gross national product of the sixth largest country on the planet! If it had not been for the 0% interest loans through the GM finance division, the General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), this company might have already gone bankrupt. In the past five years, it has been the GMAC division that has kept General Motors solvent, posting record profits besides!
In the post-9/11 world, it has been energy and commodities stocks that have led the stock market higher. This should come as no surprise, as the geopolitical arena has focused squarely upon oil, gasoline